Poll: is NUnit good enough or what, man?
The copasetic gurus who brought you NUnit have decided to create a hip new framework dubbed xUnit.net. Clearly, xUnit.net has a lot of compelling features based upon the many lessons learned from having created a rather successful framework (that is, NUnit, man); however, it seems to me that NUnit is as ubiquitous in the .NET community as Disco music is to the general world population (did you know that disco music sales were up 400% in the year ending 1976?).
Is it your bag to switch to xUnit.net or to stay with NUnit, man? I want to know.
If you are using another trippin’ framework instead of NUnit (like MSTest, etc) let me know if you plan on jumping ship as well. And if the term NUnit is strangely foreign to you, man, you may have better luck at the Java test framework poll. As always, copious thanks for participating in this most scientific poll.
| Related odds and ends | ||
|---|---|---|
Tuesday 25 Sep 2007 | Developer Testing, NUnit
@%&! Not even a mention of Much Better Unit(MbUnit)?
I am sticking with MbUnit. It has more to offer in functionality than all of the others combine. It is stable. It has a vibrant community, not just developers contributing btw. Lastly it integrates well with my dev env for a frictionless experience.
No not like body glide Andy.
Hey man, shiny clinging lycra stretch disco pants in hot strident shiny colors with stretch sequin bandeau tops can cause some major chafing on the dance floor. Body glide keeps me hip.
Was Twittering on that topic with Brad Wilson. I see it as a major retooling of our build for only incremental improvements. We’ll look again when it crosses the chasm!
Good point, Ben! I bet the XUnit.net team would love to know what feature (or features) would enable it to cross the chasm quicker.
[...] Don’t forget to participate in the highly scientific NUnit poll, baby! So far, the results aren’t too surprising. [...]