<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The skinney on complexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/</link>
	<description>Can you dig it man?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Disco Blog &#187; Copasetic code reviews</title>
		<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>The Disco Blog &#187; Copasetic code reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>[...] Neat-o tools like PMD also make it easy to spot code which should be reviewed. Because complexity metrics, like Cyclomatic complexity, strongly correlate to defects, if PMD flags a method with excessive values, taking the time to figure out why the complexity is there and determining if there is a path to mitigate it will almost certainly pay dividends in the future. Dig it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neat-o tools like PMD also make it easy to spot code which should be reviewed. Because complexity metrics, like Cyclomatic complexity, strongly correlate to defects, if PMD flags a method with excessive values, taking the time to figure out why the complexity is there and determining if there is a path to mitigate it will almost certainly pay dividends in the future. Dig it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Disco Blog &#187; Refactoring with code metrics</title>
		<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>The Disco Blog &#187; Refactoring with code metrics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscoblog.com/2006/03/31/the-skinney-on-complexity/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>[...] Unless one effectively makes use of code metrics, they are, arguably, useless data points. Luckily, it&#8217;s rather easy to employ these objective measurements of code quality when it comes to refactoring. Cyclomatic complexity, for instance, is excellent at spotting complex code, which can then be refactored using the Extract Method technique. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unless one effectively makes use of code metrics, they are, arguably, useless data points. Luckily, it&#8217;s rather easy to employ these objective measurements of code quality when it comes to refactoring. Cyclomatic complexity, for instance, is excellent at spotting complex code, which can then be refactored using the Extract Method technique. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
