<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copasetic Groovy Eclipse plug-in fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/18/copasetic-groovy-eclipse-plug-in-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/18/copasetic-groovy-eclipse-plug-in-fix/</link>
	<description>Can you dig it man?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/18/copasetic-groovy-eclipse-plug-in-fix/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscoblog.com/?p=12#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/"&gt;Groovy&lt;/a&gt; is still young- it got a lot of press too early it seems. &lt;a href="http://www.jython.org/"&gt;Jython&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.python.org/"&gt;Python&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.ruby-lang.org/"&gt;Ruby&lt;/a&gt; have been around for years and have had plenty of time to mature. 

Jython is a fun language to develop in. Itâ€™s Python based, so the learning curve is slightly steeper than that of Groovy. Check out the &lt;a href="http://pydev.sourceforge.net/"&gt;PyDev Eclipse plug-in&lt;/a&gt;- this is how the Groovy one should act someday. I suspect youâ€™ll see more tool development for Groovy once the language itself matures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://groovy.codehaus.org/">Groovy</a> is still young- it got a lot of press too early it seems. <a href="http://www.jython.org/">Jython</a>, <a href="http://www.python.org/">Python</a>, and <a href="http://www.ruby-lang.org/">Ruby</a> have been around for years and have had plenty of time to mature. </p>
<p>Jython is a fun language to develop in. Itâ€™s Python based, so the learning curve is slightly steeper than that of Groovy. Check out the <a href="http://pydev.sourceforge.net/">PyDev Eclipse plug-in</a>- this is how the Groovy one should act someday. I suspect youâ€™ll see more tool development for Groovy once the language itself matures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Dyer</title>
		<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/18/copasetic-groovy-eclipse-plug-in-fix/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscoblog.com/?p=12#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I'm down man.  Thanks for the post.  I tried to work through this a few weeks back but didn't pick up on missing import in the plugin.xml.

However...

Isn't Groovy a waste of time?  I've read a few scathing blog posts about the progress of Groovy development.  Is the fact that it is a JSR enough to expect that the language will survive and be useful in the long term?  I'd love to get into using "dynamic languages" for testing.  But I'm unsure which one to use?  Do you have any opinions about Jython as a language for rapid test development?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down man.  Thanks for the post.  I tried to work through this a few weeks back but didn&#8217;t pick up on missing import in the plugin.xml.</p>
<p>However&#8230;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t Groovy a waste of time?  I&#8217;ve read a few scathing blog posts about the progress of Groovy development.  Is the fact that it is a JSR enough to expect that the language will survive and be useful in the long term?  I&#8217;d love to get into using &#8220;dynamic languages&#8221; for testing.  But I&#8217;m unsure which one to use?  Do you have any opinions about Jython as a language for rapid test development?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
