<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code Coverage Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/04/can-you-dig-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/04/can-you-dig-it/</link>
	<description>Can you dig it man?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Disco Blog &#187; Making metrics work</title>
		<link>http://thediscoblog.com/2006/02/04/can-you-dig-it/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>The Disco Blog &#187; Making metrics work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 15:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thediscoblog.com/?p=3#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>[...] A metric, in and of itself, is not very useful&#8211; for example, code coverage is simply a number that, in isolation, doesn&#8217;t mean anything. Highly covered code is still susceptible to defects! Coverage also is not an indication of test quality, by the way. Coverage is simply a measure of test execution&#8211; what&#8217;s important is how the coverage values are utilized and compared against other hip metrics or trends. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A metric, in and of itself, is not very useful&#8211; for example, code coverage is simply a number that, in isolation, doesn&#8217;t mean anything. Highly covered code is still susceptible to defects! Coverage also is not an indication of test quality, by the way. Coverage is simply a measure of test execution&#8211; what&#8217;s important is how the coverage values are utilized and compared against other hip metrics or trends. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
